Show simple item record

dc.creatorAnderson, W.K.en_US
dc.date2003-06-25en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T20:12:52Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T20:12:52Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationW. K. Anderson. (25/6/2003). Differences in response of winter cereal varieties to applied nitrogen in the field II. Some factors associated with differences in response. Field Crops Research, 11, pp. 369-385.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12236
dc.description.abstractSome indices of nitrogen use efficiency of a relatively large number of varieties were measured under field conditions. The reliability of the estimates depended not only on the field and analytical technique employed but on the necessity to measure responses over more than one season. The influence of management and seasonal factors was demonstrated in the first paper of this series. One important finding of the experiments was that some varieties are capable of yielding more under low fertility conditions whilst others are capable of responding more to higher levels of nitrogen fertilizer. There was in general, a negative correlation between yield at zero applied nitrogen and agronomic efficiency (grain yield per unit of applied nitrogen). It is postulated that some varieties that are capable of efficient utilization of soil nitrogen may be less efficient users of applied nitrogen. Yield at zero applied nitrogen was only correlated significantly with maximum yield in one of the experiments reported. This suggests that varieties that had a high yield potential did not necessarily express it at all levels of nitrogen. In addition, there was only one significant, and in that case negative, correlation between agronomic efficiency of nitrogen use and maximum yield. Efficiency of nitrogen use was thus not consistently related to yield potential. Agronomic efficiency was related both to uptake efficiency (total nitrogen uptake/nitrogen applied) and to utilization efficiency (grain yield per unit of nitrogen uptake) but more strongly to the former. It is calculated that agronomic efficiency in winter cereals can be doubled (from 20–30 to about 50 g grain/g nitrogen applied) if the combination of high uptake and utilization efficiencies measured in the experiments can be achieved by plant breeding. It was found that whilst there was a reasonably consistent positive relationship between nitrogen harvest index and harvest index, the former was not consistently related to utilization efficiency in these experiments. This inferst that translocation of an increased proportion of total plant nitrogen to the grain did not necessarily result in increased grain production per unit of nitrogen taken up. There was a significant negative correlation between utilization efficiency and grain percentage in two experiments on durum wheat but not in bread wheat or triticale. If minimum grain protein contents are to be maintained whilst utilization efficiency is increased, parental lines which do not exhibit such a negative correlation should be chosen.en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BVen_US
dc.rightsCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dc.sourceField Crops Research;11,(2003) Pagination 369,385en_US
dc.subjectwinter cerealsen_US
dc.subjectapplied nitrogenen_US
dc.titleDifferences in response of winter cereal varieties to applied nitrogen in the field II. Some factors associated with differences in responseen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.contactw.k.anderson@unknown.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(85)90116-9en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor4.308en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV