Show simple item record

dc.contributorGrando, Stefaniaen_US
dc.contributorImpiglia, Alfredoen_US
dc.creatorCeccarelli, Salvatoreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-16T21:56:20Z
dc.date.available2021-07-16T21:56:20Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationSalvatore Ceccarelli, Stefania Grando, Alfredo Impiglia. (1/10/1998). Choice of selection strategy in breeding barley for stress environments. Euphytica, 103, pp. 307-318.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13446
dc.description.abstractProductivity of 3 different 2-year crop rotations: namely continuous wheat, wheat-chickpea, and wheat-fallow, was measured over 4 consecutive seasons beginning in 1991-92 at the ICARDA station, Tel Kadya, Syria. Nitrogen (N) fertiliser (30 kg N/ha at sowing) was broadcast every other year in the continuous wheat only. N-15-labelled fertiliser was used to quantify the amount of nitrogen supplied to the crops through current and past applications of fertiliser and by N-2 fixation. The remaining N in the crop was assumed to come from the soil. In any single season, wheat yields were unaffected by rotation or N level. However: 2-year biomass production was significantly greater (32%, on average) in the continuously cropped plots than in the wheat-fallow rotation. On average, <10% of the N in the wheat crop came from fertiliser in the season of application, and <1.2 kg N/ha of the residual fertiliser was recovered by a subsequent wheat crop. Chickpea fixed 16-48 kg N/ha, depending on the season, but a negative soil N budget was still likely because the amount of N removed in the grain was usually greater than the amount of atmospheric NP fixed. Uptake of soil N was similar in the cereal phase of all 3 rotations (38 kg N/ha, on average), but over the whole rotation at least 33% more soil N was removed from continuously cropped plots than from the wheat-fallow rotation, suggesting that the latter is a more sustainable system. A laboratory study showed that although wheat and chickpea residues enhanced the gross rate of N mineralisation by c. 50%, net rates of N mineralisation were usually negative. Given the high C/N ratio of the residue, immobilisation, rather than loss processes, is the likely cause of the decline in the mineral N content of the soil. Consequently, decomposition of crop residues in the field may in the short term reduce rather than increase the availability of N for crop growth.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature)en_US
dc.sourceEuphytica;103,Pagination 307-318en_US
dc.subjectresponse to selectionen_US
dc.subjectspecific adaptationen_US
dc.subjectgenotype by environment interactionen_US
dc.subjectlow-input agricultureen_US
dc.titleChoice of selection strategy in breeding barley for stress environmentsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1998-10-01en_US
dcterms.extent307-318en_US
dcterms.issued1998-10-01en_US
cg.subject.agrovocbarleyen_US
cg.subject.agrovochordeum vulgareen_US
cg.subject.agrovocBarleyen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerDepartment of Agriculture and Food Western Australia - DAFWAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.contacts.ceccarelli@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018647001429en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.895en_US
cg.issn0014-2336en_US
cg.issn1573-5060en_US
cg.journalEuphyticaen_US
cg.volume103en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV