Show simple item record

dc.contributorReed, Marken_US
dc.contributorQuillerou, Emmanuelleen_US
dc.contributorBuckmaster, Sarahen_US
dc.contributorFalk, Thomasen_US
dc.contributorSalha, Alien_US
dc.contributorSchmidt, Lauraen_US
dc.contributorFavretto, Nicolaen_US
dc.creatorMusekamp, Claudiaen_US
dc.identifier.citationClaudia Musekamp, Mark Reed, Emmanuelle Quillerou, Sarah Buckmaster, Thomas Falk, Ali Salha, Laura Schmidt, Nicola Favretto. (22/12/2015). ELD Initiative: Practitioner’s Guide_Pathways and Options for Action and Stakeholder Engagement. Bonn, Germany: Economics of Land Degradation Initiative (ELD).en_US
dc.description.abstractAs the world’s population continues to rise, there is an ever increasing demand for our land to produce a diverse range of products such as food, timber, and fuel. Our growing need for these goods is leading to higher levels of competition between different land uses and, as a result, land users. Not only is the quantity of land available for production under current technical and economic conditions limited, but there is also growing evidence that the quality of our land is degrading (Safriel, U. N. 2007; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005; TEEB, 2010). As a result, healthy land that is available for production is becoming an increasingly scarce resource, and there is a great need to make better use of what we have available, both now and in the future. Improved co-production of knowledge is needed between scientists, local community members, technical advisors, administrators and policy makers. These different groups may be considered “stakeholders”, defined as those who are affected by or who can affect a decision or issue (Freeman, 1984). Stakeholder engagement can be defined as “a process where individuals, groups and organisations choose to take an active role in making decisions that affect them” (Reed, 2008). It is argued that stakeholder engagement may enhance the robustness of policy decisions designed to reduce the vulnerability of ecosystems and human populations to land degradation (de Vente et al., in press). In this way, it may be possible to develop response options that are more appropriate to the needs of local communities and can protect their livelihoods and wellbeing (ibid).en_US
dc.publisherEconomics of Land Degradation Initiative (ELD)en_US
dc.titleELD Initiative: Practitioner’s Guide_Pathways and Options for Action and Stakeholder Engagementen_US
cg.subject.agrovocland degradationen_US
cg.contributor.centerBirmingham City University - BCUen_US
cg.contributor.centerTechnopole de Brest-Iroise - TBIen_US
cg.contributor.centerEconomics of Land Degradation Initiative - ELDen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Hamburg - UHHen_US
cg.contributor.centerUnited Nations University Institute of Water, Environment and Health - UNU-INWEHen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV