Show simple item record

dc.contributorEnahoro, Dolapoen_US
dc.creatorFrija, Aymenen_US
dc.date2018-12-31en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-13T08:55:53Z
dc.date.available2019-02-13T08:55:53Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/c1edaed83e931f6edf2577f6e6aeff82en_US
dc.identifier.citationAymen Frija, Dolapo Enahoro. (31/12/2018). Elaboration of Livestock R&D Scenarios and Assessment of the Impact of Alternative Investment Scenarios on Employment Generation: A Methodological Framework.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/9439
dc.description.abstractAs agriculture is the largest employment sector in Sub-Saharan Africa, and as the average contribution of agriculture to GDP is more than 17% (OECD/FAO, 2016; World Bank, 2017), the agricultural employment growth can be a driving force of eradicating extreme poverty in these marginalized areas. Agricultural employment growth in the extreme poverty stricken Sub-Saharan Africa is however limited by a number of factors. The world’s population is expected to increase in between 8.71 billion to 10.8 billion by 2050 (UN, 2015), and 65% of the increase of population will take place in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia. Due to the population pressure, the per capita arable land has been declining in Sub-Saharan Africa. In 1961, the per capita arable land in Sub-Saharan Africa was 0.57ha, which has declined to 0.22ha, in 2015 (World Bank, 2017). With further increase of population, the per capita arable land availability will also further decline in these regions. This ever-declining land-man ratio can, firstly push the people out of agriculture, and secondly may force people to stay in the agricultural sector out of necessity but not by choice. Also, the declining land-man ratio can push the marginal productivity of agricultural labor further down, and, hence can aggravate the poverty situation in Sub-Saharan Africa. In a recent study, Bezu and Holden (2014) demonstrate that young Ethiopians are pushed out of agricultural activities mainly due to the lack of access to the agricultural land, and only 9% of the young Ethiopians opted for agriculture as their future occupation also because of this land constraint. An escape from this impasse can be adequate public and private investments in agricultural capital goods, such as on new machinery, infrastructure, and technology. Given the strong welfare impacts, agricultural investment can be instrumental in increasing employment and thus reducing poverty and hunger in the agriculture dependent extreme poverty-stricken regions. Particularly, government expenditure in highly positively associated with agricultural capital formation and growth exhibits the decisive role of the government expenditure in creating an enabling environment and thriving agricultural sector. Research has revealed that 10% increase in public expenditure on agriculture leads to 0.34 percent increase in a country’s agricultural total factor productivity. In the same time, agricultural growth, particularly in Africa is considered as more pro-poor compared to industrial growth, primarily because it allows for greater participation of the poorest smallholders in the growth process (Diao et al., 2010a). This is more relevant for the poorest developing economies with high concentration of smallholder farmers, and where agriculture is the dominant sector in the poorest rural areas. This is also relevant for both, crops and livestock activities due to the respective importance of these activities in the different African countries.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.subjectagricultural labor forceen_US
dc.subjectagricultural investmenten_US
dc.titleElaboration of Livestock R&D Scenarios and Assessment of the Impact of Alternative Investment Scenarios on Employment Generation: A Methodological Frameworken_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
cg.creator.idFrija, Aymen: 0000-0001-8379-9054en_US
cg.creator.idEnahoro, Dolapo: 0000-0002-4927-5617en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocimpact assessmenten_US
cg.subject.agrovoclivestocken_US
cg.subject.agrovocsmallholdersen_US
cg.subject.agrovocresearch and developmenten_US
cg.subject.agrovocgoal 1 no povertyen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIATen_US
cg.contributor.centerDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit - GIZen_US
cg.contributor.centerSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences - SLUen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Livestock Agri-Food Systems - LAFSen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.projectCGIAR Research Program on Livestock Agri-Food Systemsen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryBFen_US
cg.coverage.countryTZen_US
cg.contactA.Frija@cgiar.orgen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/237en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV