Modelling spatial-temporal covariance structures in monocropping barley trials

cg.contactM.SINGH@CGIAR.ORGen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.creator.idSingh, Murari: 0000-0001-5450-0949en_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02664760701832992en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0266-4763en_US
cg.issn1360-0532en_US
cg.issue3en_US
cg.journalJournal of Applied Statisticsen_US
cg.volume35en_US
dc.contributorJones, Michaelen_US
dc.creatorSingh, Murarien_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T22:00:32Z
dc.date.available2021-07-13T22:00:32Z
dc.description.abstractIn long-term trials, not only are individual plot errors correlated over time but there is also a consistent underlying spatial variability in field conditions. The current study sought the most appropriate covariance structure of errors correlated in three dimensions for evaluating the productivity and time-trends in the barley yield data from the monocropping system established in northern Syria. The best spatial-temporal model found reflected the contribution of autocorrelations in spatial and temporal dimensions with estimates varying with the yield variable and location. Compared with a control structure based on independent errors, this covariance structure improved the significance of the fertilizer effect and the interaction with year. Time-trends were estimated in two ways: by accounting the seasonal variable contribution in annual variability (Method 1), which is suitable for detecting significant trends in short data series; and by using the linear component of the orthogonal polynomial on time (year), which is appropriate for long series (Method 2). Method 1 strengthened time-trend detection compared with the method of Jones and Singh [J. Agri. Sci., Cambridge 135 (2000), pp. 251-259] which assumed independence of temporal errors. Most estimates of yield trends over time from fertilizer application were numerically greater than the corresponding linear trends estimated from orthogonal polynomials in time (Method 2), reflecting the effect of accounting for seasonal variables. Grain yield declined over time at the drier site in the absence of nitrogen or phosphorus application, but positive trends were observed fairly generally for straw yield and for grain yield under higher levels of fertilizer inputs. It is suggested that analyses of long-term trials on other crops and cropping systems in other agro-ecological zones could be improved by taking spatial and temporal variability into account in the data evaluation.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationMurari Singh, Michael Jones. (13/3/2008). Modelling spatial-temporal covariance structures in monocropping barley trials. Journal of Applied Statistics, 35 (3), pp. 321-333.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13394
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Applied Statistics;35,(2008) Pagination 321-333en_US
dc.subjectremlen_US
dc.subjectbarley monocroppingen_US
dc.subjectlong-term trialsen_US
dc.subjectspatial-temporal covarianceen_US
dc.subjecttime-trenden_US
dc.titleModelling spatial-temporal covariance structures in monocropping barley trialsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2008-03-13en_US
dcterms.extent321-333en_US
mel.impact-factor1.404en_US

Files