Whole genome re-sequencing reveals genome-wide variations among parental lines of 16 mapping populations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Mahendar Thudi, Aamir Khan, Vinay Kumar, Pooran Gaur, Mohan AVS Katta, Garg Vanika, Manish Roorkiwal, Srinivasan Samineni, Rajeev Varshney. (27/1/2016). Whole genome re-sequencing reveals genome-wide variations among parental lines of 16 mapping populations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. ). BMC Plant Biology, 16 (10), pp. 53-64.

Abstract

Background: Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the second most important grain legume cultivated by resource poor farmers in South Asia and SubSaharan Africa. In order to harness the untapped genetic potential available for chickpea improvement, we resequenced 35 chickpea genotypes representing parental lines of 16 mapping populations segregating for abiotic (drought, heat, salinity), biotic stresses (Fusarium wilt, Ascochyta blight, Botrytis grey mould, Helicoverpa armigera) and nutritionally important (protein content) traits using whole genome resequencing approach. Results: A total of 192.19 Gb data, generated on 35 genotypes of chickpea, comprising 973.13 million reads, with an average sequencing depth of ~10 X for each line. On an average 92.18 % reads from each genotype were aligned to the chickpea reference genome with 82.17 % coverage. A total of 2,058,566 unique single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 292,588 Indels were detected while comparing with the reference chickpea genome. Highest number of SNPs were identified on the Ca4 pseudomolecule. In addition, copy number variations (CNVs) such as gene deletions and duplications were identified across the chickpea parental genotypes, which were minimum in PI 489777 (1 gene deletion) and maximum in JG 74 (1,497). A total of 164,856 line specific variations (144,888 SNPs and 19,968 Indels) with the highest percentage were identified in coding regions in ICC 1496 (21 %) followed by ICCV 97105 (12 %). Of 539 miscellaneous variations, 339, 138 and 62 were interchromosomal variations (CTX), intrachromosomal variations (ITX) and inversions (INV) respectively. Conclusion: Genomewide SNPs, Indels, CNVs, PAVs, and miscellaneous variations identified in different mapping populations are a valuable resource in genetic research and helpful in locating genes/genomic segments responsible for economically important traits. Further, the genomewide variations identified in the present study can be used for developing high density SNP arrays for genetics and breeding applications.