Breeding programs for smallholder sheep farming systems: I. Evaluation of alternative designs of breeding schemes
Views
0% 0
Downloads
0 0%
Limited access
Citation
Solomon Gizaw Assefa, Barbara Rischkowsky, Anne Valle Zarate, Aynalem Haile, Johan van Arendonk, Ally Okeyo Mwai, Tadelle Dessie. (31/10/2014). Breeding programs for smallholder sheep farming systems: I. Evaluation of alternative designs of breeding schemes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 131 (5), pp. 341-349.
Abstract
Village- and central nucleus-based schemes were simulated and evaluated
for their relative bio-economic efficiencies, using Ethiopia’s Menz sheep as
example. The schemes were: village-based 2-tier (Scheme-1) and 1-tier
(Scheme-2) cooperative village breeding schemes, dispersed village-based
nuclei scheme (Scheme-3), conventional 2-tier central nucleus-based
scheme (Scheme-4), and schemes linking a central nucleus and village
multiplier nuclei with selection in central nucleus (Scheme-5) or in both
central and village nuclei (Scheme-6). Among village-based schemes,
Scheme-1 gave the highest genetic progress, while Scheme-2 was economically
the most efficient with genetic gain in the breeding objective of Birr
5.6 and a profit of Birr 37.2/ewe/year. The central nucleus schemes were
more efficient than the village schemes. Scheme-4 was the most efficient
with genetic gain in the breeding objective of Birr 13.5 and a profit of Birr
71.2, but is operationally more difficult as it requires a very large central
nucleus. The choice between village and central nucleus-based schemes
would depend on local conditions (availability of infrastructure, logistics
and technical knowhow and support). Linking central nucleus with village-
based nuclei (Scheme-6) would be a feasible option to overcome the
operational difficulties of the conventional central nucleus scheme. If a village-
based breeding program is envisaged as should be the 1st step in most
low-input systems, then Scheme-2 is the most efficient. To scale out to an
entire Menz breed level, Scheme-3 would be recommended.
Permanent link
AGROVOC Keyword(s)
Subject(s)
Author(s) ORCID(s)
Gizaw Assefa, Solomon https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7489-062X
Rischkowsky, Barbara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-471X
Haile, Aynalem https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5914-0487
van Arendonk, Johan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-3947
Mwai, Ally Okeyo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2379-7801
Dessie, Tadelle https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1630-0417
Rischkowsky, Barbara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-471X
Haile, Aynalem https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5914-0487
van Arendonk, Johan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-3947
Mwai, Ally Okeyo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2379-7801
Dessie, Tadelle https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1630-0417