Soil-landscape modeling and land suitability evaluation: the case of rainwater harvesting in a dry rangeland environment
Views
0% 0
Downloads
0 0%
Limited access
View/Open
Corresponding Author
Date
2012-02-28
Date Issued
2012-08-01
ISI Journal
Impact factor: 3.93 (Year: 2012)
Authors
Citation
Anwar Al-Shamiri, Feras M. Ziadat. (1/8/2012). Soil-landscape modeling and land suitability evaluation: the case of rainwater harvesting in a dry rangeland environment. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, pp. 157-164.
Abstract
The arid to semi-arid region is characterized by a scarcity of land and water resources, which threatens the livelihoods of the inhabitants. Rainwater harvesting is an important practice to improve water and land productivity and to cope with climate change in the drier marginal environments. The accurate determination of the location and types of rainwater harvesting interventions through a land suitability assessment is key to successful implementation. However, adequate information about land resources is needed. Unfortunately, the arid areas suffer from a scarcity of detailed soil information and preparation of this data is often costly and time consuming. This research examines the utility of modern soil-landscape modeling techniques to provide soil and topographic information that improves land suitability assessment. The suitability of the land for two types of rainwater harvesting – contour ridges and runoff strips – to grow range crops (Atriplex – Atriplex halimus) or field crops (barley – Hordeum vulgare) was examined. Two methods were compared for an area of 26 km2 – spatial interpolation between observations (inverse distance weighted) using 108 points, and a soil-landscape prediction model that used terrain attributes derived from a digital elevation model (DEM). Soil depth was predicted to within ±40 cm for 89% of the field observations and surface stoniness was predicted to within ±20% for 82% using the soil-landscape model. The corresponding values using the spatial interpolation model were 81% and 73%. The agreement between the suitability classes derived from field observations and those derived from the soil-landscape prediction model was slightly better than those derived from the interpolation model. Moreover, the spatial distribution of the suitability classification derived from the soil-landscape prediction model shows a more realistic pattern and better identification of extreme land characteristics, such as rocky areas and deep soils. These results will help in generating reliable suitability maps that support the implementation of sustainable land use alternatives in the arid environment.