Identifying water-responsive and drought-tolerant chickpea genotypes

cg.contacta.hamwieh@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.creator.idHamwieh, Aladdin: 0000-0001-6060-5560en_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1071/CP14225en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn1836-0947en_US
cg.issue10en_US
cg.journalCROP & PASTURE SCIENCEen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdroughten_US
cg.subject.agrovoccicer arietinumen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeasen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfield capacityen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeaen_US
cg.volume66en_US
dc.contributorImtiaz, Muhammaden_US
dc.creatorHamwieh, Aladdinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T00:21:44Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T00:21:44Z
dc.description.abstractThis study quantifies the responses of drought-tolerant genotypes of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to water availability under three irrigation regimes: rainfed (T1), 30% of full supplemental irrigation (T2), and full supplemental irrigation (T3). Sixteen genotypes of chickpea were tested in a split-plot arrangement in a randomised complete block design with three replications. Drought-resistance score (DRS), days to 50% flowering, plant height, days to maturity (DTM), grain yield (GY), biological yield (BY), 100-seed weight, average number of pods per plant (PoN), and average number of seeds per plant (SN) were measured. ANOVA indicated significant differences between treatments, years, and genotypes. Two genotypes, FLIP03-145C and ILC588, showed high drought tolerance accompanied by lower DTM, and they produced the highest GY (9.3 g plant(-1)). Strong and significant (P < 0.001) correlations were observed between GY and BY (0.94), SN (0.93), and PoN (0.94). The GY, BY, SN, and PoN traits were significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with DRS (-0.51 to -0.58). Ten genotypes performed better under T2 than T3, indicating a limitation in response to more water availability. Three genotypes (FLIP03-145C, ILC3182, and ILC588) are recommended for the national programs of Mediterranean countries as being drought-tolerant and especially responsive to water.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationAladdin Hamwieh, Muhammad Imtiaz. (30/7/2015). Identifying water-responsive and drought-tolerant chickpea genotypes. CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 66 (10), pp. 1003-1011.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12974
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen_US
dc.sourceCROP & PASTURE SCIENCE;66,(2015) Pagination 1003-1011en_US
dc.titleIdentifying water-responsive and drought-tolerant chickpea genotypesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2015-07-30en_US
dcterms.extent1003-1011en_US
mel.impact-factor1.57en_US

Files