What plant breeding may (and may not) look like in 2050?

cg.contactrodomiro.ortiz@slu.seen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences - SLUen_US
cg.contributor.crpGenetic Innovation - GIen_US
cg.contributor.funderArab Fund for Economic and Social Development - AFESDen_US
cg.contributor.funderRoyal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry - KSLAen_US
cg.contributor.initiativeAccelerated Breedingen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.creator.idBassi, Filippo: 0000-0002-1164-5598en_US
cg.creator.idSanchez-Garcia, Miguel: 0000-0002-9257-4583en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20368en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn1940-3372en_US
cg.journalThe Plant Genomeen_US
cg.subject.actionAreaGenetic Innovationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocplant breedingen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwheaten_US
cg.subject.agrovocfood systemsen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaClimate adaptation and mitigationen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 1 - No povertyen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 2 - Zero hungeren_US
dc.contributorSanchez-Garcia, Miguelen_US
dc.contributorOrtiz, Rodomiroen_US
dc.creatorBassi, Filippoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T19:02:36Z
dc.date.available2023-10-11T19:02:36Z
dc.description.abstractAt the turn of 2000 many authors envisioned future plant breeding. Twenty years after, which of those authors’ visions became reality or not, and which ones may become so in the years to come. After two decades of debates, climate change is a “certainty,” food systems shifted from maximizing farm production to reducing environmental impact, and hopes placed into GMOs are mitigated by their low appre ciation by consumers. We revise herein how plant breeding may raise or reduce genetic gains based on the breeder’s equation. “Accuracy of Selection” has signif icantly improved by many experimental-scale field and laboratory implements, but also by vulgarizing statistical models, and integrating DNA markers into selection. Pre-breeding has really promoted the increase of useful “Genetic Variance.” Short ening “Recycling Time” has seen great progression, to the point that achieving a denominator equal to “1” is becoming a possibility. Maintaining high “Selection Intensity” remains the biggest challenge, since adding any technology results in a higher cost per progeny, despite the steady reduction in cost per datapoint. Further more, the concepts of variety and seed enterprise might change with the advent of cheaper genomic tools to monitor their use and the promotion of participatory or cit izen science. The technological and societal changes influence the new generation of plant breeders, moving them further away from field work, emphasizing instead the use of genomic-based selection methods relying on big data. We envisage what skills plant breeders of tomorrow might need to address challenges, and whether their time in the field may dwindle.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/e581907250c757eaee57dc912a167abd/v/a0d0115bd4aa4a04e334bce559ef450fen_US
dc.identifier.citationFilippo Bassi, Miguel Sanchez-Garcia, Rodomiro Ortiz. (16/7/2023). What plant breeding may (and may not) look like in 2050. The Plant Genome.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/68731
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCrop Science Society of Americaen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0en_US
dc.sourceThe Plant Genome;(2023)en_US
dc.titleWhat plant breeding may (and may not) look like in 2050?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2023-07-16en_US
mel.impact-factor4.2en_US

Files