Landscape approaches for sustainable land systems: A critical systematic review of frameworks, governance, and socio-ecological outcomes
Views
0% 0
Downloads
0 0%
Open access
Citation
Zahra Shiri, Quang Bao Le, Hassen Ouerghemmi, Hichem Rejeb. (2/10/2025). Landscape approaches for sustainable land systems: A critical systematic review of frameworks, governance, and socio-ecological outcomes. Landscape Architecture and Sustainability, 2.
Abstract
Persistent sectoral fragmentation in governance actively hinders effective responses to the global biodiversity crisis. Landscape approaches (LAs) emerge a direct countermeasure to this fragmentation, designed as integrative frameworks for managing socio-ecological systems through multi-functionality, multi-stakeholder governance, and adaptability. Yet conceptual ambiguity, evaluation gaps, and policy barriers challenge their implementation. This systematic review aggregates a 10-year (2015–mid-2025) span of LA studies combining computational text analysis (topic modeling, co-occurrence networks, trends over time) with human full-text analysis of 2682 peer-reviewed articles—to map conceptual progress, governance arrangements, and socio- ecological outcomes. Results indicate linear growth in research output by the US, Indonesia, and China, reflecting geographic bias. Thematic focus shifted from broad landscapes to climate mitigation-linked carbon and forest science. Biophysical perspectives prevailed: 66% of papers did not address social effects (livelihoods, equity, participation), and 74% omitted institutional changes. Leading frameworks were Resilience (5.4%) and Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR, 3.5%), and central research themes were forest/farmland management (48.5%) and biodiversity conservation (17.2%). Governance arrangements were infrequently discussed (32% of papers), most commonly co-management (11%); innovations (e.g., digital platform) were rarely documented (7%). Reflexivity was limited, as 60% of studies did not examine challenges, 66% overlooked success factors, and 59% did not report limitations. The field exhibits epistemic inequalities (Northern knowledge dominance), methodological fragmentation (underrepresentation of social sciences and qualitative approaches e), and an implementation gap (weak links with governance/innovation). Prioritizing ecological indicators (carbon, biodiversity) may marginalize social justice and institutional aspects. Potential pathways forward include international cooperation, actual interdisciplinary integration, cross-scale thematic linkages, actionable innovations/polycentric governance arrangements, and incorporating reflexivity to support LAs as tools for equitable and sustainable land system transformation.
Permanent link
Collections
Other URI
AGROVOC Keyword(s)
Author(s) ORCID(s)
Le, Quang Bao https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8514-1088