Assessment of Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum) Grain Quality and Losses in Direct Combine Harvesting

cg.contactunknown425@unknown.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerAmerican University of Beirut - AUBen_US
cg.contributor.centerUnited Arab Emirate University - UAUEen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31615en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0001-2351en_US
cg.issue1en_US
cg.journalTransactions of the ASAEen_US
cg.subject.agrovocmechanical harvestingen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeasen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeaen_US
cg.volume34en_US
dc.contributorSingh, K. Ben_US
dc.contributorBirbari, W.en_US
dc.creatorHaffar, I.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T21:22:58Z
dc.date.available2021-10-21T21:22:58Z
dc.description.abstractAn experiment was conducted at the International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA) to test the effect of several combine harvester settings on returns of two chickpea varieties ILC 482 and ILC 3279 developed at the Center as potentials for mechanical harvesting. The settings on the harvester included three forward speeds, three concave clearances, and two cleaning fan capacities. The experimental design was general randomized complete block design with multiple observations per treatment. The two varieties were considered as the blocks and all treatment combinations were replicated four times within each block. Harvesting output studied included harvest total weight, and that of whole grains, broken grains, and unthreshed pods. Losses included those of threshing and shattering which were sampled and weighed using known standards. Statistical analysis showed that forward speed was a highly significant contributor to variations in harvest returns among all other treatments. The block effect (varieties) was also highly significant for all sample parameters in the experiment. Variety ILC 482 proved to be a better potential variety for mechanical harvesting due to its higher inherent yield even though it had higher percentages of harvesting losses.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationI. Haffar, K. B Singh, W. Birbari. (28/2/1991). Assessment of Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum) Grain Quality and Losses in Direct Combine Harvesting. Transactions of the ASAE, 34 (1), pp. 9-13.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66266
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherAMER SOC AGR ENGINEERSen_US
dc.sourceTransactions of the ASAE;34,(1991) Pagination 9-13en_US
dc.subjectgrain harvestingen_US
dc.titleAssessment of Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum) Grain Quality and Losses in Direct Combine Harvestingen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1991-02-28en_US
dcterms.extent9-13en_US

Files