Adoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies and practices in fragile and conflict-affected settings

cg.contacterukundo@rwi-essen.deen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Bonn - Uni-Bonnen_US
cg.contributor.centerThe World Bank - WBen_US
cg.contributor.centerCatholic University Leuven - KULen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of the Free State - UFSen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics - Uni-Bonn-ILRen_US
cg.contributor.centerRWI Liebniz Institute for Economic Research in Essenen_US
cg.contributor.centerApata Insightsen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.contributor.initiativeFragility to Resilience in Central and West Asia and North Africaen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.creator.idDhehibi, Boubaker: 0000-0003-3854-6669en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03171-7en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn2662-4435en_US
cg.journalCommunications Earth & Environmenten_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.subject.actionAreaResilient Agrifood Systemsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultural productivityen_US
cg.volume7en_US
dc.contributorJr Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paulen_US
dc.contributorGebrekidan, Bisrat Haileen_US
dc.contributorAgaba, Monicaen_US
dc.contributorSurendran Padmaja, Subashen_US
dc.contributorDhehibi, Boubakeren_US
dc.creatorNshakira-Rukundo, Emmanuelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-29T19:19:33Z
dc.date.available2026-04-29T19:19:33Z
dc.description.abstractA major challenge for countries dealing with conflict and instability is promoting the use of climatesmart farming technologies and practices. In this meta-analysis, we assess determinants of farmers’ adoption decisions for such innovations. We employ advanced machine learning-aided literature selection and review 112 papers selected from over 42,000 published papers covering countries in fragile and conflict settings. We categorized the technologies into five technology groups, including soil health, erosion management, mechanization, input use and risk reduction technologies and extract 1374 coefficients. Univariate and multivariate partial correlation coefficient analysis suggests that factors such as training, access to information, subsidies, and past experiences of using technologies predict technology adoption. However, there are significant differences across technology groups and most especially, a very low coverage of risk-reduction technologies such as insurance is recorded.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/a6c63c7b4bb808b62f60365abf4ff8c5en_US
dc.identifier.citationEmmanuel Nshakira-Rukundo, Martin Paul Jr Tabe-Ojong, Bisrat Haile Gebrekidan, Monica Agaba, Subash Surendran Padmaja, Boubaker Dhehibi. (30/3/2026). Adoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies and practices in fragile and conflict-affected settings. Communications Earth & Environment, 7.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/70649
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherNATURE RESEARCHen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceCommunications Earth & Environment;7,(2026)en_US
dc.subjectclimate-smart farming technologiesen_US
dc.titleAdoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies and practices in fragile and conflict-affected settingsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2026-03-30en_US
dcterms.hasVersionV3 - 2026-04-29en_US
mel.impact-factor8.9en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: