Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services for pastoralists in rangeland settings

cg.contactLinda.Pappagallo@eui.euen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.centerEuropean University Institute - EUIen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Livestock Agri-Food Systems - Livestocken_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.projectCGIAR Research Program on Livestock Agri-Food Systemsen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryKEen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.subject.agrovocecosystem servicesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocrangelandsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocpastoralistsen_US
dc.creatorPappagallo, Lindaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-10T22:35:00Z
dc.date.available2019-01-10T22:35:00Z
dc.description.abstractPayments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes are gaining popularity as an environmental and development policy tool. Spurred by environmental motives, different financial and non-financial incentive schemes are designed to create positive social and environmental impact. Although the experience of PES implementation is relatively significant in the agricultural, forestry and to a certain degree marine sector, the application of PES for pastoralists in rangeland settings is limited. Furthermore, there is very little focus in the existing literature on the challenges of operationalizing PES for pastoralists. This study aims to jump from the theory of PES implementation to practice by examining the trade-offs, barriers and opportunities that can be expected when operationalizing PES schemes for pastoralists in rangeland settings. The study follows a framework that encompasses the complexities of pastoral systems—the political, legal, institutional, social, environmental and financial aspects that determine PES scheme design—and allows a critical examination of these factors. While PES schemes may offer an opportunity to bridge pastoral livelihood systems with sustainable rangeland ecosystem service provision, the variability of its impact as an effective tool calls for scrupulous context-specific assessments. An outcome of this study has been a preliminary scoping protocol, designed to guide practitioners to comprehensively unearth and evaluate the risks and opportunities of operationalizing PES schemes in different pastoral contexts. This study is particularly interesting for practitioners as it views PES implementation from a practical angle and offers resources, case-study examples, tools and complementary solutions to help overcome some of the PES implementation challenges.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3625/pdfen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/e6680f9d5ab6efef747dd4b0c7fa400e/v/aff3565899d5948edbe4c1a6d21d0312en_US
dc.identifier.citationLinda Pappagallo. (12/4/2018). Operationalizing payments for ecosystem services for pastoralists in rangeland settings. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/9109
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.subjectpayments for ecosystem services (pes)en_US
dc.titleOperationalizing payments for ecosystem services for pastoralists in rangeland settingsen_US
dc.typeInternal Reporten_US
dcterms.available2018-04-12en_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/237en_US

Files