Contrasting soil seed bank and vegetation dynamics between protected and disturbed arid rangelands in Southern Tunisia

cg.contacttlili_abderrazak@yahoo.fren_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerArid Regions Institute - IRAen_US
cg.contributor.centerNational Agricultural Research Institute of Tunisia - INRATen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.contributor.projectCODIS - Corporate-Communication and Documentation Information Servicesen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryTNen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.creator.idOuled Belgacem, Azaiez: 0000-0002-5946-7540en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1743624en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn1664-462Xen_US
cg.journalFrontiers in Plant Scienceen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.subject.agrovocprotected areasen_US
cg.subject.agrovocarid rangelandsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgrazing managementen_US
cg.subject.agrovocecosystem resilienceen_US
cg.volume17en_US
dc.contributorNeffati, Mohameden_US
dc.contributorDadi, Kamelen_US
dc.contributorOuled Belgacem, Azaiezen_US
dc.creatorTlili, Abderrazaken_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-24T20:47:13Z
dc.date.available2026-09-24T20:47:13Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Over recent decades, accelerated degradation of arid rangelands has led to significant losses in ecosystem function, in some cases surpassing irreversible thresholds that hinder restoration. Soil seed banks (SSBs) serve as critical ecological reservoirs influencing vegetation succession and ecosystem resilience after disturbance.Methods: This study investigates the effects of grazing on both above-ground vegetation (AGV) and SSB dynamics. It evaluates the efficacy of long-term protection as a restoration strategy in arid ecosystems. We compared a protected area (a national park) with adjacent continuously grazed rangelands by monitoring above-ground vegetation during the 2022 spring growing season and conducting an emergence test on soil samples collected in summer 2022 at two depths (0–3 cm and 3–6 cm).Results and discussion: Protection substantially increased vegetation cover and improved surface properties, including litter accumulation and the development of biological soil crusts. The protected site supported persistent perennial, medium- to high-palatability species, while grazed areas exhibited higher SSB density and richness dominated by ephemeral, disturbance-tolerant taxa associated with sparse vegetation and highly disturbed soils. Sorensen’s similarity coefficient (SSCI) indicated high similarity between above-ground vegetation inside versus outside protection (0.77), moderate similarity between SSBs (0.62), and a greater decoupling between above- and below-ground components in the protected area (0.43) compared to grazed rangelands (0.57). Despite the similarity in shared species occurring under both management regimes, total vegetation cover, plant density, and species richness increased significantly under protection, highlighting the negative impact of continuous grazing in arid environments. However, when combined with aridity, plant senescence and surface crust formation may create barriers to regeneration and limit the long-term dynamics of both AGV and the SSB under prolonged protection. These findings indicate that both prolonged protection and continuous grazing can diminish regeneration potential and reduce resilience in arid rangelands. Accordingly, controlled grazing regimes that balance disturbance with sufficient recovery periods, coupled with regular monitoring of SSB, are critical for maintaining ecosystem function and resilience. Further research is needed to investigate SSB dynamics under different management practices, particularly at sites where controlled grazing systems are implemented.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/86acfd739d7237bd4122df4ac4c7e548en_US
dc.identifier.citationAbderrazak Tlili, Mohamed Neffati, Kamel Dadi, Azaiez Ouled Belgacem. (23/4/2026). Contrasting soil seed bank and vegetation dynamics between protected and disturbed arid rangelands in Southern Tunisia. Frontiers in Plant Science, 17.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/70876
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceFrontiers in Plant Science;17,(2026)en_US
dc.subjectsoil seed banken_US
dc.titleContrasting soil seed bank and vegetation dynamics between protected and disturbed arid rangelands in Southern Tunisiaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2026-04-23en_US
dcterms.hasVersionV2 - 2026-09-24en_US
dcterms.issued2026-04-23en_US
mel.impact-factor5.9en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: