Evaluation of proline analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence quenching measurements as drought tolerance indicators in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum)

cg.contactunknown349@unknown.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerTishreen University, Faculty of Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.centerFrench National Institute for Agricultural Research, Ecole Nationale Superieure Agronomique de Montpellier - ENSA‐INRAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00023577en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0014-2336en_US
cg.issn1573-5060en_US
cg.journalEuphyticaen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdrought toleranceen_US
cg.subject.agrovocyield componentsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocDurum Wheaten_US
cg.volume79en_US
dc.contributorMonneveux, Philippeen_US
dc.contributorAcevedo, Edmundoen_US
dc.contributorMiloudi, Nachiten_US
dc.creatorAli Dib, Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-18T20:21:21Z
dc.date.available2021-06-18T20:21:21Z
dc.description.abstractThe possibility of using proline accumulation and fluorescence inhibition as predictive tests for drought tolerance in durum wheat has been investigated. The drought susceptibility of 25 genotypes was evaluated by comparing yields and yield components in irrigated and non irrigated conditions in the field. A drought susceptibility index (DSI) was calculated based on yields from irrigated and dry treatments and compared with the results obtained using the two physiological criteria. Proline accumulation and chlorophyll fluorescence inhibition were found to be significantly and negatively correlated with DSI of grain yield, biological yield, and thousand kernel weight, and tiller index. The use of both criteria for breeding durum wheat in Mediterranean dryland is discussed.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationT Ali Dib, Philippe Monneveux, Edmundo Acevedo, Nachit Miloudi. (1/1/1994). Evaluation of proline analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence quenching measurements as drought tolerance indicators in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Euphytica, 79, pp. 65-73.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13250
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature)en_US
dc.sourceEuphytica;79,(1994) Pagination 65-73en_US
dc.subjecttriticum turgidum l. var. durumen_US
dc.subjectdrought susceptibility indexen_US
dc.subjectproline accumulationen_US
dc.subjectfluorescence inhibitionen_US
dc.subjectphysiological criteriaen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of proline analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence quenching measurements as drought tolerance indicators in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum)en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1994-01-01en_US
dcterms.extent65-73en_US
mel.impact-factor1.614en_US

Files