Comparative life cycle assessment of olive (Olea europaea L.) production under different agricultural systems: Environmental trade-offs and sustainability insights

cg.contactmakrem.cherni@fst.utm.tnen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerOlive Institute - IOen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Tunis El Manar - UTMen_US
cg.contributor.centerInstitut National de Recherche et d'Analyse Physico-chimique - INRAPen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Gabes - UG Tunisen_US
cg.contributor.centerAfrican Plant Nutrition Institute - APNIen_US
cg.contributor.centerAgricultural Institute of Slovenia - kisen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.contributor.programAcceleratorMultifunctional Landscapesen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryTNen_US
cg.coverage.end-date2025-09-29en_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.start-date2024-09-01en_US
cg.creator.idDhehibi, Boubaker: 0000-0003-3854-6669en_US
cg.creator.idFrija, Aymen: 0000-0001-8379-9054en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2026.100288en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn2666‑9161en_US
cg.journalResources, Environment and Sustainabilityen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.subject.agrovocoliveen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaClimate adaptation and mitigationen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food securityen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaPoverty reduction, livelihoods and jobsen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaGender equality, youth and social inclusionen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaEnvironmental health and biodiversityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 1 - No povertyen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 2 - Zero hungeren_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 3 - Good health and well-beingen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 5 - Gender equalityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 8 - Decent work and economic growthen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 11 - Sustainable cities and communitiesen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 12 - Responsible consumption and productionen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 13 - Climate actionen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 15 - Life on landen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 17 - Partnerships for the goalsen_US
cg.volume23en_US
dc.contributorBen Ammar, Hajeren_US
dc.contributorGuesmi, Mohameden_US
dc.contributorLanwer, Rabiien_US
dc.contributorHidri, Yassineen_US
dc.contributorOuertani, Khaleden_US
dc.contributorBoulal, Hakimen_US
dc.contributorDhehibi, Boubakeren_US
dc.contributorFrija, Aymenen_US
dc.contributorLarbi, Ajmien_US
dc.creatorCherni, Mekremen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-03T20:47:30Z
dc.date.available2026-03-03T20:47:30Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Olive cultivation is a major agroecosystem in the Mediterranean basin, yet the environmental performance of its production systems remains poorly quantified, particularly in North Africa where life cycle inventory (LCI) data are limited. Methods: This study applied a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to eight representative olive production systems (traditional, integrated, and intensive). Primary data were obtained from field surveys and farm records, while secondary data from the Ecoinvent database were used for background processes. Environmental impacts were evaluated per hectare and per ton of olives for global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication and water consumption. Results: Fertilization and soil management emerged as dominant hotspots across all assessed impact categories, with synthetic inputs contributing up to 576 kg CO 2 -eq/ha to global warming potential and driving nutrient related burdens. Water consumption ranged from 0.98 to 1767 m 3 /ha, primarily influenced by irrigation intensity. Overall global warming potential varied from 617 to 2583 kg CO 2 -eq/ha, reflecting substantial differences in input levels and resource-use efficiency among systems. Discussion and conclusions: The results demonstrate that environmental performance is strongly shaped by fertilizer regimes, irrigation practices, and soil management. Precision nutrient management, optimized irrigation, reduced tillage and agroecological interventions could substantially reduce impacts. This study provides one of the first structured LCAs for Tunisian olive systems and offers essential evidence to support the development of robust regional LCI datasets for Mediterranean olive production.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/f44feb659bfba4b4d233fd43b8d8b796en_US
dc.identifier.citationMekrem Cherni, Hajer Ben Ammar, Mohamed Guesmi, Rabii Lanwer, Yassine Hidri, Khaled Ouertani, Hakim Boulal, Boubaker Dhehibi, Aymen Frija, Ajmi Larbi. (13/1/2026). Comparative life cycle assessment of olive (Olea europaea L. ) production under different agricultural systems: Environmental trade-offs and sustainability insights. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 23, pp. 100-288.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/70620
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.Ven_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceResources, Environment and Sustainability;23,(2026) Pagination 100-288en_US
dc.subjectmediterranean cropping systemsen_US
dc.subjectolive cultivationen_US
dc.subjectlife cycle assessment (lca)en_US
dc.subjectecosystem impactsen_US
dc.subjectagri-environmental indicatorsen_US
dc.titleComparative life cycle assessment of olive (Olea europaea L.) production under different agricultural systems: Environmental trade-offs and sustainability insightsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2026-01-06en_US
dcterms.extent100-288en_US
dcterms.hasVersionV11 - 2026-09-24en_US
dcterms.issued2026-01-13en_US
mel.impact-factor9.2en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: