Framing just agroecological transitions through participatory multistakeholder processes

cg.contactgenowefa.blundo_canto@cirad.fren_US
cg.contributor.centerBioversity International - Bioversity (Alliance)en_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIAT (Alliance)en_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Food Policy Research Institute - IFPRIen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.centerThe French Agricultural Research Center for International Development - CIRADen_US
cg.contributor.centerThe University of British Columbia - UBCen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Hohenheim - UHOHen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.contributor.projectCODIS - Corporate-Communication and Documentation Information Servicesen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryINen_US
cg.coverage.countryKEen_US
cg.coverage.countryPEen_US
cg.coverage.countrySNen_US
cg.coverage.countryTNen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouth Americaen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.creator.idBlundo Canto, Genowefa: 0000-0003-4182-3663en_US
cg.creator.idFrija, Aymen: 0000-0001-8379-9054en_US
cg.creator.idIdoudi, Zied: 0000-0003-2717-7845en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00307270261477117en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0030-7270en_US
cg.issue3en_US
cg.journalOutlook On Agricultureen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.subject.agrovocparticipationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocagroecologyen_US
cg.subject.agrovocmulti-stakeholder processesen_US
cg.volume55en_US
dc.contributorVikram, Vrindajaen_US
dc.contributorFalk, Thomasen_US
dc.contributorFuchs, Lisa Elenaen_US
dc.contributorChimonyo, Vimbayi Grace Petrovaen_US
dc.contributorTristán, Maria Claudiaen_US
dc.contributorGupta, Shwetaen_US
dc.contributorBergamini, Nadiaen_US
dc.contributorFrija, Aymenen_US
dc.contributorIdoudi, Zieden_US
dc.contributorPiraux, Marcen_US
dc.contributorSingh, Sonalien_US
dc.contributorTriomphe, Bernarden_US
dc.creatorBlundo Canto, Genowefaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-07T17:38:42Z
dc.date.available2026-10-07T17:38:42Z
dc.description.abstractAgroecology, as conceptualised in the thirteen HLPE principles, embeds justice dimensions in the place-based sustainable transition pathways it supports, yet operationalising just agroecological transitions is understudied and remains a design and implementation challenge. In this paper, we apply Schlosberg's four-dimensional justice framework post-hoc, distinguishing distributive, procedural, recognition, and capabilities justice, to six country-level Vision to Action participatory visioning processes conducted under the CGIAR Agroecology Initiative in India, Kenya, Peru, Senegal, Tunisia, and Zimbabwe. Although these processes had not been designed with explicit justice objectives, justice-relevant content emerged across them: competing visions revealed whose values are at stake in the transition; the composition and design of sessions determined whose knowledge shaped transition pathways; and intra-transition trade-offs revealed who bears the costs of change. The analysis revealed shared concerns around food security, fair returns, gender equity, and reduced external input dependence, which took locally specific forms. Capabilities concerns shaped transition pathways more than distributive and recognition claims; and a recurrent tension between visions of input autonomy and pathways of input substitution emerged. Government and private-sector actors were less represented than farmers but were generally assigned significant responsibility for enabling the transition. We argue that participatory multi-stakeholder visioning creates the conditions under which the justice content of agroecological transitions becomes visible, negotiable, and translatable into action planning. Establishing an explicit justice framing ex ante would allow deliberate choices on participant disaggregation while systematic mapping and engagement strategies for absent actors would allow future processes to embed justice-relevant content explicitly from the design stage.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/703291cf4a16b66f2979026e1304568den_US
dc.identifier.citationGenowefa Blundo Canto, Vrindaja Vikram, Thomas Falk, Lisa Elena Fuchs, Vimbayi Grace Petrova Chimonyo, Maria Claudia Tristán, Shweta Gupta, Nadia Bergamini, Aymen Frija, Zied Idoudi, Marc Piraux, Sonali Singh, Bernard Triomphe. (1/9/2026). Framing just agroecological transitions through participatory multistakeholder processes. Outlook On Agriculture, 55 (3).en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/70928
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTDen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceOutlook On Agriculture;55,(2026)en_US
dc.subjectvisioningen_US
dc.subjectjust transitionen_US
dc.titleFraming just agroecological transitions through participatory multistakeholder processesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2026-08-26en_US
dcterms.hasVersionV7 - 2026-10-07en_US
dcterms.issued2026-09-01en_US
mel.impact-factor3.2en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: